Names follow the SUEWS YAML specification; click one for its definition in the configuration reference.
lai.lai_type | 1 |
lai.lai_min | 1.6 |
lai.lai_max | 5.9 |
Where: Table 2(b), LAImax,grass and LAImin,grass rows, p. 223
Publishes the exact grass LAI maximum 5.9 and minimum 1.6 among the general model run parameters.
Where: Section 2, Model developments, p. 4
Documents that SUEWS_v2016a combines the former irrigated and non-irrigated grass types into one grass surface, with irrigation represented separately.
Where: Section 4.1, Seasonal cycle of vegetation phenology, p. 7
Evaluates the daily LAI seasonal cycle using vegetation photographs from Swindon and London; it reports reasonable timing overall but full leaf-out slightly too early and suddenly, without publishing new grass LAI minimum or maximum bounds.
| Name | supported Ward et al. (2016) documents the v2016a consolidation of irrigated and non-irrigated grass into one grass surface, so the plain Grass label matches the active SUEWS land-cover class. |
|---|---|
| Target | supported Järvi et al. (2011) publishes the LAI bounds as grass surface-type parameters, and Ward et al. (2016) documents the later single grass land-cover class. |
| Values | supported Järvi et al. (2011) publishes the exact grass LAI minimum 1.6 and maximum 5.9. Ward et al. (2016) later evaluates the active daily LAI phenology at the two UK sites; it does not originate replacement bounds. |
| Source | supported Järvi et al. (2011) is the checked publication that states the exact stored bounds. Ward et al. (2016) is later UK application and phenology-evaluation evidence, not the parameter source for a London-specific fit. issue #112 |
| Place | supported The exact bounds are published as shared model parameters rather than observations from SE England. Ward et al. (2016) applies and evaluates the phenology in London and Swindon but does not establish a UK origin for the bounds, so generic is the supported active evidence scope. |
| Representativeness | supported The evidence supports reusable model defaults subsequently applied at two UK sites, not a regional survey or London fit; generic therefore states how far the bounds travel without converting migration origin into scientific provenance. |
| Applicable Scale | supported Both papers assign the parameters to the SUEWS grass surface class, which is a sub-grid land-cover class rather than a whole-neighborhood aggregate, facet or material specimen. |
| Method | supported The record adopts exact values from a published model parameter table without fitting or recalculating them, so literature is the applicable method. |
| Identity | supported The stable SE England path, origin and legacy ID preserve migration lineage. The corrected name, source and generic scope describe the active evidence without presenting the bounds as a London-specific record. |
Järvi et al. (2011) Table 2 is the checked publication for the exact 1.6 and 5.9 grass LAI bounds. Ward et al. (2016) later applies the model at London and Swindon, documents the single v2016a grass surface, and evaluates UK phenology; it does not make the unchanged bounds a London fit. The active evidence fields are therefore generic and literature-based, while the stable path, SE England origin and legacy ID retain the record's migration history.
Paste under land_cover.grass in a SUEWS YAML configuration; every value carries its citation.
lai:
lai_type:
value: 1
ref:
ID: jarvi2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.001
desc: generic, generic, land_cover
lai_min:
value: 1.6
ref:
ID: jarvi2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.001
desc: generic, generic, land_cover
lai_max:
value: 5.9
ref:
ID: jarvi2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.001
desc: generic, generic, land_cover
Raises a prefilled sign-off issue. CI accepts it only when the issue author is in the verifier registry and the evidence revision is still current.
Review procedureland_cover.grass · docs