Names follow the SUEWS YAML specification; click one for its definition in the configuration reference.
a1 | 0.83 |
a2 | 0.52 |
a3 | -16.95 |
Where: Section 1.1, observation site, p. 694
One teaching-building roof at 32.04 N, 118.79 E is instrumented; the grey-white cement slab is 20 m by 10 m and approximately 30 cm thick.
Where: Section 2, source-area interpretation, p. 695
Because the sensors are close to the slab and the flux source area is small, the source area is treated as the roof plane.
Where: Section 3.2, Equation 3, summer OHM fit, p. 696
The fitted summer coefficients are a1 0.83, a2 0.52 and a3 -16.95.
Where: Section 4, conclusions, p. 698
The conclusions describe the storage-heat behaviour of the studied urban-roof cement slab.
Where: Appendix B, building coefficient source text, p. 13161
Where: Table B1, Building summer row, p. 13162
Dou et al. reproduce the summer tuple and attribute it to Wang et al. (2008), concrete roof.
| Name | supported Concrete roof matches the instrumented grey-white cement roof slab described by Wang et al. |
|---|---|
| Target | supported Wang et al. fit objective hysteresis model coefficients for storage heat flux over the roof. |
| Values | supported Equation 3 gives the summer tuple 0.83, 0.52 and -16.95; Dou et al. independently reproduce the same values. |
| Source | supported Wang et al. directly derive and publish the stored summer coefficients. |
| Place | supported The instrumented teaching-building roof is located in Nanjing at 32.04 N, 118.79 E. |
| Representativeness | supported Site is appropriate because the fit uses one 20 m by 10 m instrumented cement roof slab, not a city-scale roof sample. |
| Applicable Scale | supported Wang et al. fit the summer coefficients to one instrumented concrete roof slab. The described unit is therefore a roof facet. issue #46 |
| Method | supported The coefficients are fitted from the measured summer roof energy-balance data, so fitted is the supported method. |
| Identity | supported A single summer coefficient triplet for the studied concrete roof is stored, distinct from the winter fit. |
The original full text establishes that this is a fitted summer OHM tuple from one instrumented teaching-building roof slab. The paper discusses the surrounding urban setting and possible wider applicability, but it does not sample or validate roofs across Nanjing. The database therefore classifies the evidence at site scale while preserving Nanjing as the location. The separate winter fit remains in its own record and review.
Paste under ohm_coefficients in a SUEWS YAML configuration; every value carries its citation.
a1:
value: 0.83
ref:
ID: wang2008
DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2008.06.011
desc: nanjing, site, facet
a2:
value: 0.52
ref:
ID: wang2008
DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2008.06.011
desc: nanjing, site, facet
a3:
value: -16.95
ref:
ID: wang2008
DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-0096.2008.06.011
desc: nanjing, site, facet
Raises a prefilled sign-off issue. CI accepts it only when the issue author is in the verifier registry and the evidence revision is still current.
Review procedure