Names follow the SUEWS YAML specification; click one for its definition in the configuration reference.
Where: SUEWS v2016a SUEWS_Irrigation.txt, rows 550 and 660
Publishes the exact No Irrigation tuples selected for the London and Swindon configurations, including the day range, zero schedule, faut and retained legacy controls.
Where: Section 3.2, model setup, p. 6
States that irrigation was assumed to be zero at the two UK sites; this supports the modelling choice but is not the direct table for every field in the tuple.
| Name | supported The v2016a input table labels both selected rows No Irrigation, and Ward et al. state that irrigation was assumed zero for both UK simulations. |
|---|---|
| Target | supported The immutable SUEWS_Irrigation.txt fixture publishes the tuple in the irrigation input table. |
| Values | supported Rows 550 and 660 publish the same all-year, zero-water-use schedule and retained legacy controls as the record, at the available precision. |
| Source | supported The pinned v2016a input is the direct source for the exact tuple. Ward et al. support the modelling rationale that both UK sites used no irrigation, but do not publish every stored field. issue #1075 |
| Place | supported The shared record represents the same no-irrigation configuration applied at the London and Swindon sites. The stable se-england place describes that two-site application geography rather than a regional measurement. |
| Representativeness | supported The configuration is documented for two site simulations, so site is the supported evidence reach; neither source establishes a regional determination. |
| Method | supported Ward et al. explicitly describe irrigation as assumed zero, matching method assumed. |
| Identity | supported Stable path, target, origin, legacy ID and all parameter values are retained. The two identical v2016a site rows explain why one migrated SE England record represents both applications. |
The record is an assumed model-input configuration, not a regional empirical irrigation estimate. The pinned v2016a input table supplies the exact fields, while Ward et al. document why zero irrigation was used for the London and Swindon evaluations. The correction separates numeric source from scientific rationale without changing any value, stable path, raw origin or legacy identity.
H_maintain | -999 |
Ie_a1 | 0 |
Ie_a2 | 0 |
Ie_a3 | 0 |
Ie_m1 | 0 |
Ie_m2 | 0 |
Ie_m3 | 0 |
Paste under irrigation in a SUEWS YAML configuration; every value carries its citation.
ie_start:
value: 1
ref:
ID: umep-dev2016a
DOI: null
desc: se-england, site
ie_end:
value: 366
ref:
ID: umep-dev2016a
DOI: null
desc: se-england, site
internalwateruse_h:
value: 0
ref:
ID: umep-dev2016a
DOI: null
desc: se-england, site
faut:
value: 0
ref:
ID: umep-dev2016a
DOI: null
desc: se-england, site
daywat:
sunday: 0
monday: 0
tuesday: 0
wednesday: 0
thursday: 0
friday: 0
saturday: 0
daywatper:
sunday: 0
monday: 0
tuesday: 0
wednesday: 0
thursday: 0
friday: 0
saturday: 0
Raises a prefilled sign-off issue. CI accepts it only when the issue author is in the verifier registry and the evidence revision is still current.
Review procedureirrigation · docs